Comments on: Is my theory bullshit? http://handyfloss.net/2008.03/is-my-theory-bullshit/ Because FLOSS is handy, isn't it? Wed, 07 Jan 2009 17:16:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: isilanes http://handyfloss.net/2008.03/is-my-theory-bullshit/comment-page-1/#comment-166 isilanes Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:23:22 +0000 http://handyfloss.net/2008.03/is-my-theory-bullshit/#comment-166 Thanks for the link, Iñigo! I am all for Popper. It is quite reasonable that, if we do not use [[Occam's razor]] to cut somewhere, coupled with rejection of the non-falsifiable, then we will be stuck with believing almost anything, from UFOs to Flaying Spaghetti Monsters. Thanks for the link, Iñigo!

I am all for Popper. It is quite reasonable that, if we do not use Occam's razor to cut somewhere, coupled with rejection of the non-falsifiable, then we will be stuck with believing almost anything, from UFOs to Flaying Spaghetti Monsters.

]]> By: Iñigo http://handyfloss.net/2008.03/is-my-theory-bullshit/comment-page-1/#comment-165 Iñigo Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:09:38 +0000 http://handyfloss.net/2008.03/is-my-theory-bullshit/#comment-165 It seems you are on Popper's side. You can find a discussion about your idea in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability . Cheers It seems you are on Popper’s side. You can find a discussion about your idea in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Falsifiability .

Cheers

]]>